Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:make_submission_process:make_for_edu_roles [2026-04-13 10:42] – Julien Delisle | public:make_submission_process:make_for_edu_roles [2026-04-13 14:48] (current) – [The student managers] Julien Delisle | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| <WRAP center round info 60%> | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
| - | Even though students are the driving force behind MAKE projects, an EPFL Professor is still holding the main responsability | + | Even though students are the driving force behind MAKE projects, they cannot be entirely responsible of their project, an EPFL Professor is still holding the main responsability |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Three main roles are identified | Three main roles are identified | ||
| * A Professor (main applicant) | * A Professor (main applicant) | ||
| - | * A coordinator | + | * A coordinator |
| * The student managers | * The student managers | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| This document describes the different responsabilities associated with each of these roles | This document describes the different responsabilities associated with each of these roles | ||
| - | ===== The Professor supervising the project | + | ==== The Professor supervising the project ==== |
| - | As the main applicant, the Professor is in charge of the project global supervision | + | As the main applicant, the Professor is in charge of the project global supervision and have the operational responsibility for it. The Professor must ensure proper scientific endorsement, |
| + | |||
| + | ==== The coordinator ==== | ||
| + | The coordinator is seconding the Professor in charge of the project with a regular supervision of the student team. Every project is different and will have different issues that cannot always be anticipated. However, the following two main tasks have been identified to be important in the supervision of MAKE for EDU projects | ||
| + | * Administrive and operational questions | ||
| + | * Managing the fund for the projet and ordering consummables for students using catalyse, | ||
| + | * Handling/ | ||
| + | * Academic questions | ||
| + | * Supporting students with technical expertise and coaching | ||
| + | * Coordinating with the different EPFL laboratories that will credit the students | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The student managers | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most MAKE projects are defining different managerial roles to run their project (CEO, CFO, CTO etc..). The students have the responsability to run the project from A to Z, with the approval of their Professor and coordinator. They can be hold responsible if they lack transparency towards their supervisors. They are therefore required to be completely transparent with their supervisors, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every team is encouraged to think about their management and organizational structure (top-down with a hierarchy, flatter managerial structure with more consensual decision making etc..) but the MAKE committee is requesting at least two student leaders to sign the MAKE submission : | ||
| + | * The president of the association or CEO | ||
| + | * The logistic manager to make the link with the makerspaces (storage etc..) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||