Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:admin:make_selection_process [2024-07-04 08:27] – ↷ Page moved from external:make_selection_process to public:admin:make_selection_process Julien Delisle | public:admin:make_selection_process [2026-03-10 14:25] (current) – Julien Delisle | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== MAKE interdisciplinary projects | + | ====== MAKE interdisciplinary projects: submitting a project proposal |
| ==== Guidelines for the selection process ==== | ==== Guidelines for the selection process ==== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ====== Context ====== | ====== Context ====== | ||
| - | This document describes the process of the MAKE committee to select | + | This document describes the process of the MAKE committee to select projects at EPFL. As a reminder, information about interdisciplinary projects can be found here: https:// |
| When a project is selected by the MAKE committee, it receives funding and access to resources (resources that are complementary to the resources existing in the laboratories) | When a project is selected by the MAKE committee, it receives funding and access to resources (resources that are complementary to the resources existing in the laboratories) | ||
| Two different committees are involved in the selection of MAKE interdisciplinary projects, with the following roles. | Two different committees are involved in the selection of MAKE interdisciplinary projects, with the following roles. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| //**The operational committee: | //**The operational committee: | ||
| * Following the projects throughout the year and providing support if necessary. The operational committee provides recommendations to the strategic committee. | * Following the projects throughout the year and providing support if necessary. The operational committee provides recommendations to the strategic committee. | ||
| - | * The operational committee can make recommendations to stop a project if safety issues are identified anytime. | + | * The operational committee can make recommendations to stop a project if safety issues are identified |
| * The operational committee is composed of six members including representative of the VPT (durability), | * The operational committee is composed of six members including representative of the VPT (durability), | ||
| **//The strategic committee:// | **//The strategic committee:// | ||
| * Handling strategic questions, such as the long-term evolution of the project portfolio and repartition between sections | * Handling strategic questions, such as the long-term evolution of the project portfolio and repartition between sections | ||
| - | * The strategic committee is composed of members including | + | * The strategic committee is composed of members including representatives of the 5 faculties and the AVP-education |
| + | |||
| + | ====== Project categories eligible ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | One of the core value of the MAKE program is to let students propose ideas. In order to support the wide variety of MAKE | ||
| Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
| **//Project related criteria’s// | **//Project related criteria’s// | ||
| - | * (mandatory) A good supervision by Professor and coordinator in charge as well as partner laboratories | + | * (mandatory) A good supervision by an EPFL Professor and a coordinator |
| - | * The project feasibility: | + | * The project feasibility: |
| - | * The prototype to build is realistic with EPFL resources and existing | + | * The prototype to build is challenging and requiring multiple backgrounds but it is still realistic with the existing |
| * The budget (including sponsors) is realistic for the objectives set | * The budget (including sponsors) is realistic for the objectives set | ||
| * Risks (financial, accident, EPFL image, etc.) shall be identified and mitigated properly | * Risks (financial, accident, EPFL image, etc.) shall be identified and mitigated properly | ||
| Line 35: | Line 40: | ||
| **// | **// | ||
| - | * Learning by doing: the project should reinforce theoretical learning seen in courses through practical implementation. | + | |
| - | * Open ended: the project should offer the possibility for students to develop their creativity and to look for many different potential solutions | + | |
| - | * Interdisciplinarity: | + | |
| - | * Transversal skills: the project must allow transversal skills development (group/ | + | |
| - | * Sustainability: | + | |
| - | A given project can be very strong regarding a given criteria and less developed in another. For instance, a given project could be strongly | + | A given project can be very strong regarding a given criteria and less developed in another. For instance, a given project could be strongly |
| The strategic and operational committees will evaluate the global picture of every project to make their decisions. | The strategic and operational committees will evaluate the global picture of every project to make their decisions. | ||
| Line 62: | Line 67: | ||
| Role and responsibilities of the different committees are described in the next chapter. | Role and responsibilities of the different committees are described in the next chapter. | ||
| - | {{ :external:timeline_make_selection.jpg?direct |}} | + | {{ :public:selection_process.png?direct |}} |
| * The strategic committee meets every year early July | * The strategic committee meets every year early July | ||
| * The operational committee collaborates with projects over the year. Members from this committee stay in close contact with projects needing support or improvement in a specific area (see under for more information) | * The operational committee collaborates with projects over the year. Members from this committee stay in close contact with projects needing support or improvement in a specific area (see under for more information) | ||
| + | The documents to submit early June, for a three year conditional support, are the following: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * {{ : | ||
| + | * {{ : | ||
| + | * {{ : | ||
| Line 85: | Line 95: | ||
| * One representative of the VPA | * One representative of the VPA | ||
| * One student representative | * One student representative | ||
| - | * One representative of the CTCC for transversal competences | + | * One representative of the CAPE (teaching support center) |
| * One representative of the VPT with expertise in sustainability | * One representative of the VPT with expertise in sustainability | ||
| * One representative of the AVP-SAO (student affairs) | * One representative of the AVP-SAO (student affairs) | ||
| - | * The MAKE coordinator | + | * The MAKE coordinators |
| - | ====== Advice to project managers ====== | ||
| - | When contacted by the operational committee, the project managers are expected to answer and to collaborate to ensure good project development. The operational committee’s aim is to support the projects to maximize student learning and ensure their safety, they will ensure their intervention(s) are personalized and related to concrete aspects of the project. | ||
| ====== The strategic committee ====== | ====== The strategic committee ====== | ||
| Line 101: | Line 109: | ||
| * //The project funding is conditional and must be validated every year, based on the operational committee report. (The three-year scope allows to give the students and Professors a longer-term scope needed to settle such ambitious projects and the yearly review allows to take action if the project is not matching expectations.)// | * //The project funding is conditional and must be validated every year, based on the operational committee report. (The three-year scope allows to give the students and Professors a longer-term scope needed to settle such ambitious projects and the yearly review allows to take action if the project is not matching expectations.)// | ||
| * Stopping a project if the quality declines and does not match EPFL standards (in terms of supervision and/or feasibility) – based on recommendations provided by the operational committee | * Stopping a project if the quality declines and does not match EPFL standards (in terms of supervision and/or feasibility) – based on recommendations provided by the operational committee | ||
| - | * Taking strategic decisions, and equilibrating the project portfolio to match EPFL objectives and project representativity to ensure among other equity | + | * Taking strategic decisions and equilibrating the project portfolio to match EPFL objectives |
| // | // | ||