Table of Contents

MAKE FOR EDU - Roles and responsabilities

Students are usually the driving force behind MAKE projects. However, MAKE projects are strongly related to EPFL and its educational ecosystem, it is therefore crucial to support the students with a proper supervision to ensure:

Even though students are the driving force behind MAKE projects, they cannot be entirely responsible of their project, an EPFL Professor is still holding the main responsability

Three main roles are identified for running a MAKE for EDU project successfully at EPFL:

This document describes the different responsabilities associated with each of these roles

The Professor supervising the project

As the main applicant, the Professor is in charge of the project global supervision and have the operational responsibility for it. The Professor must ensure proper scientific endorsement, organization and logistics, legal issues, insurances issues, off-campus activities - or more generally that the project follow-up and the student’s safety - are handled properly.

The coordinator

The coordinator is seconding the Professor in charge of the project with a regular supervision of the student team. Every project is different and will have different issues that cannot always be anticipated. However, the following two main tasks have been identified to be important in the supervision of MAKE for EDU projects

The student managers

Most MAKE projects are defining different managerial roles to run their project (CEO, CFO, CTO etc..). The students have the responsability to run the project from A to Z, with the approval of their Professor and coordinator. They can be hold responsible if they lack transparency towards their supervisors. They are therefore required to be completely transparent with their supervisors, especially about important decisions (for example signing a new sponsoring contract, engaging in off-campus activities, ensuring students are insured properly etc..).

Every team is encouraged to think about their management and organizational structure (top-down with a hierarchy, flatter managerial structure with more consensual decision making etc..) but the MAKE committee is requesting at least two student leaders to sign the MAKE submission :